Parašė daktaras
Rodyti pranešimą
vertimukus trumpus galėtum įdėti, reikia paskui prašinėti vertėjavimų 
Originalas.
Seip tai kazkoks kvailas vertimas, jei nepasakyt kad tendencingas. Rusiskai iskart duodama suprast, kad "del UK jis nera tikras", o originale parasyta:
Strauss-Kahn said he did not think Ireland or Britain would need an IMF bailout to overcome the effects of the global financial crisis.
On Britain, which had to seek IMF help in 1976, he said: "It has been part of the history several years ago, but it is not the case today."
Asked if he was absolutely confident the British government might never seek IMF help, he said: "We never know, you know. One year ago, if somebody had said that a Republican government in ... the U.S., would nationalise part of the banking system you would have said it's totally impossible. It happened. So never say never."
On Britain, which had to seek IMF help in 1976, he said: "It has been part of the history several years ago, but it is not the case today."
Asked if he was absolutely confident the British government might never seek IMF help, he said: "We never know, you know. One year ago, if somebody had said that a Republican government in ... the U.S., would nationalise part of the banking system you would have said it's totally impossible. It happened. So never say never."
Garantija, kad butu atsakes lygiai ta pati jei jo paklaustu ar yra visiskai tikras del airijos.
vertime irgi parašyta, kad visko gali būti su ta Britanija, ir kad ne faktas, kad ir jai neteks prašyti paramos. Turint raumeny, kad ten toliau sproginėja bankai, tai tikrai nebėra nerealus dalykas. Kaip ir niekas šiandien nebėra nerealu ir tai faktas. Nes jei būtų viskas plius minus gerai, neabejoju, kad būtų atsakęs "GB for IMF, are you kidding?".
Comment