Neramumai islamo pasaulyje (AF, SY, IQ, EG, LY, TN, DZ, MA, YE, BH, ...)

[ViR2]

Index, primink, kuriuo atveju JAV ar Izraelis sunaikino ar bent isgyvendino kazkuriuos teroristus? Afganistano, Irako, Libijos, Libano, Chado, Zairo, Somalijos ar kituose frontuose? Nebuvo nei vieno atvejo, kai isikistu ir kazkas is to gero gautusi. Geriau jau tokia politika paliktu Britams ir Prancuzams

[balietis]

Vakar rusai atidarė numuštojo lėktuvo juodąją dėžę, stebint užsienio ekspertams ir dar tiesioginiam TV eteryje. 3 sluoksnių aliumininis korpusas atrodė visai perspektyviai, bet viduje rado mikroschemų faršą. Tiesą sakant abejoju, ar kas nors tą dėžę bent nuo stalo buvo pabandęs numesti testavimų metu.
Nuotraukos ir emocingas vai vai pabėdavojimas kvadratinėm raidėm - http://guardia-rojo.livejournal.com/23036.html

[ViR2]

Itariu, kad tas visumas ir buvo "atmazke", kad nereiketu kurt "nenugincijamu irodymu"

[balietis]

Nu bet šitaip apsilažalint tiesioginiam etery?

[senasnamas]

O JAV ir Izraelis kalti, kad sugeba tik sunaikinti teroristus, nepasiūlydami normalios politinės alternatyvos vidurio rytams.

Teroristų naikinimas yra mažiausios svarbos klausimas. Naikina neparankią politiką vykdančių valstybių vadovus. Kokią galima pasiūlyti normalią politinę alternatyvą? Pasodinti į postą lojalų statytinį? To ir siekiama.

[ViR2]

Mazai ir apsidirbo, pazadejo "istraukt", bet nepakrito korta, ir visi mate, kad nepakrito, tai ant to viesumo viska ir pakars Butu daug stipriau apsidirbe, jei butu atidare, rade sveikas mikroschemas, bet "nesugebeje" atkurti "teisingu" duomenu

Teroristų nenaikina. Naikina neparankią politiką vykdančių valstybių vadovus. Kokią galima pasiūlyti normalią politinę alternatyvą? Pasodinti į postą lojalų statytinį? To ir siekiama.

Izraeliui regione naudingas kuo didesnis susiskaldymas, todel ir gydo al nusra, fsa ir is net tuos pacius SAA kareivius (nors Sirai ta neigia, kaip tik gali). Kuo labiau suskaldytos aplinkines valstybes - tuo saugesne Izraelio okupacija, nes neatsiras jokio Salah ad-Din, kuris sugebetu ja uzbaigt Jiems net naudinga viesai pliekt Irana, o paslapcia perdavinet zvalgybine info apie Saudu princus pilnus kontrabandos/narkotiku kaimyniniam Libana, kad tik apie tas salis galetu susilpnint Net ir Hezbollah egzistavimas yra nerealiai naudingas, nes turi stipresni motyva kasmet prasyt 3mlrd USD "paramos" is JAV

[index]

Index, primink, kuriuo atveju JAV ar Izraelis sunaikino ar bent isgyvendino kazkuriuos teroristus? Afganistano, Irako, Libijos, Libano, Chado, Zairo, Somalijos ar kituose frontuose? Nebuvo nei vieno atvejo, kai isikistu ir kazkas is to gero gautusi. Geriau jau tokia politika paliktu Britams ir Prancuzams

Na, Afganistane Al Qaedos neliko, Talibanas iš grupuotės, kuri vadovauja šaliai, tapo eiliniais teroristais, kurie kartais kur nors mašiną susprogdina ar kur nors terorizuoja vietinius kaimiečius.

Jei būtų atsiradusi stipri vietinė valdžia, tai ir tiek nesugebėtų.

Dėl Izraelio "Palestinos laisvės kovotojų" teroristai irgi iš esmės nukenksminti tiek, kad liko tik savo, kokiais buvo 70-80'aisiais, šešėlis ir sugeba tik nužudyti kokius iš mokyklos einančius žydų vaikus ar užpuldinėti žmones gatvėse su peiliais.

Kita vertus, o ką Izraeliui reikėjo daryti? Leisti PLO perimti Libano valdymą? Leisti šiaip ten gyvuoti ir patogiai šaudyti į Izraelį raketas? Atiduoti Libaną Sirijai, kad jau ji galėtų iš ten pulti Izraelį? Ar atiduoti Libaną PLO, kad tada jau nauja Libano valdžia oficialiai karą pradėtų? Ten problema buvo ne tiek Izraelio veiksmai (kurie buvo savigyna), kiek aplinkinių musulmoniškų kraštų parama PLO teroristams.

[ViR2]

Izraelio savigyna? Kokiam iskreiptam pasaulyj savigyna vadinama okupacija ir kitos salies puolimas? Gal ir 6 dienu karas irgi buvo Egipto/Sirijos/Irako/Jordanijos/Libano savigyna?

O kol Izraelis nenutrauks nelegalios okupacijos, tol intifados eis viena po kitos bet vargu ar Izraelis su bibi priesakyj nurimtu neispjoves visu vietiniu arabu ir dar nelegaliai atsikandes kuriu kaimynu, vistiek liktu nenubaustes, net ir po galybes UN rezoliuciju. Priesingai nuo jo kaimyno Sadamo ar, kad ir to pacio Assadu klano

[index]

Izraelio savigyna? Kokiam iskreiptam pasaulyj savigyna vadinama okupacija ir kitos salies puolimas? Gal ir 6 dienu karas irgi buvo Egipto/Sirijos/Irako/Jordanijos/Libano savigyna?

Libano atveju iš esmės, taip. "Okupacija" buvo ne tik savigyna, bet ir dalies vietinių gelbėjimas nuo atsibasčiusių teroristų:

1) Jei Baltarusijoje šalia Lietuvos sienos įsikurtų kokia nors iš Rusijos atvykusi agresyvių vatnykų organizacija, kuri pradėtų Gradais apšaudyti Vilnių, organizuoti žygius į Šalčininkus ir bandyti perimti valdžią visoje Baltarusijoje, tos vietos okupacija būtų savigyna ar baisus nusikaltimas?

2) Izraelis įsikišo tik tada kai kilo karas tarp vietinių krikščionių ir PLO teroristų, iš esmės paremdamas vietinius krikščionis libaniečius kovoje prieš PLO. Problemos prasidėjo dėl to, kad dalis libaniečių (sunni ir shia) PLO palaikė, o dalis - krikščionys - prieš juos kovojo.

O kol Izraelis nenutrauks nelegalios okupacijos, tol intifados eis viena po kitos bet vargu ar Izraelis su bibi priesakyj nurimtu neispjoves visu vietiniu arabu ir dar nelegaliai atsikandes kuriu kaimynu, vistiek liktu nenubaustes, net ir po galybes UN rezoliuciju. Priesingai nuo jo kaimyno Sadamo ar, kad ir to pacio Assadu klano

Klausimas apie kieno okupaciją kalba eina. Manau, kad Palestinos arabai nenusiramins ir nepradės normaliai gyventi kol Izraelis nenutrauks viso Izraelio "okupacijos".

[andyour]

Izraelio savigyna? Kokiam iskreiptam pasaulyj savigyna vadinama okupacija ir kitos salies puolimas? Gal ir 6 dienu karas irgi buvo Egipto/Sirijos/Irako/Jordanijos/Libano savigyna?

Bet tie karai turi priežastį. Ar tu manai, kad žydai šiaip sau nemėgstą arabų, nes vaikystėje tiesiog taip išauklėjo ir tokie paliko? Aš manau, kad žydai grėsmę jaučia neperdėtai. Dėl to stengiasi ją pašalinti visai būdais.
Dėl noro pelnytis iš naftos nesutikčiau, nes JAV su Saudo Arabija kaip ir daro biznį, perka naftą ir nenukariauja jos. Ir išvis, vadovaujauntis tokiais metodais, JAV būtų Rusijos atitikmuo ar dar blogiau.

[andyour]

Klausimas apie kieno okupaciją kalba eina. Manau, kad Palestinos arabai nenusiramins ir nepradės normaliai gyventi kol Izraelis nenutrauks viso Izraelio "okupacijos".

Bet ir niekas kitas nieko negali dėl to padaryti. Jei net Rusija palaiko gerus santykius su Izraeliu. Palestiniečiai berods jau turėjo šansą pradėti gyventi normaliai, kad ir be dalies žemių. Jeigu tau nerūpi tavo vaikų ateitis, o tik kažkoks žemės lopinėlis, tai pats kaltas.
Ir išvis, valstybių teritorijos yra tik formalumai, skirti valstybėms susitarti. Tai smarkiai neapsprendžia šalies likimo. O jei dar daugiau filosofuojant, žemę visais laikais pasisavindavo kas norėdavo arba kas buvo pirmas ją atradę. Nėra jokiuose dievo raštuose užrašyta, kad konkreti žemė priklauso konkrečiai tautai.

[senasnamas]

Su talibais vis dar "tebedirbama" ir savarankiškai Afganistanas nesusitvarko

Britai rengia atsaką Talibanui Afganistane
Skaitykite daugiau: http://www.delfi.lt/news/daily/world....d?id=69933884

Britų Gynybos ministerijos pranešime nenurodoma, kiek karių dislokuota, bet tvirtinama, kad jie kovos veiksmuose nedalyvaus. Helmado provincijoje jau dislokuota ir amerikiečių, kurie padeda afganams, sakė anksčiau šią savaitę vienas aukštesnio rango Vakarų šalių pareigūnas. Vakarų pajėgas vėl prireikė dislokuoti, nors prieš metus JAV vadovaujama NATO kovos misiją Afganistane formaliai buvo baigta, perėjus prie afganų pajėgų apmokymo ir konsultacijų.

Žydų ekstremistų lyderis nori uždrausti „vampyrų“ krikščionių Kalėdas Izraelyje
Skaitykite daugiau: http://www.delfi.lt/news/daily/world....d?id=69932346

[index]

Tuo metu Irake Daesh kapojasi su Pešmerga prie Mosulo (klausimas ar Daesh bando kontraatakuoti ar čia Mosulo mūšio pradžia?), o Irakas gana greitai artėja prie Ramadi išvadavimo.

Panašu, kad modelis panašus kaip "Free Sinjar": Irako sausumos pajėgos, koalicijos bombardavimas ir amerikiečių specialiųjų pajėgų intelligence.

Video yra nelabai malonių vaizdų!

Panašu, kad vis labiau artėja Daesh Irake pabaiga.

Atnaujinu: NYT praneša, kad Daesh kontroliuoja jau tik labai nedidelę dalį Ramadžio.



https://twitter.com/nytgraphics/stat...02538244825094

[ViR2]

Puiki kaledine dovana nuo Sirijos oro ir spec pajegu speciolios misijos:
Pasiusta i ora visa jihadistu is Jaish al Islam vadovybe i ora, iskaitant Zahran Aloush, Jaish al Islam grupuotes vaduka, kuris buvo laikomas 3ciu itakingiausiu teroristu Sirijoje Tikiuosi Sirijos pajegos sugebes isnaudoti situacija Damaske ir greitai stumsis i prieki

Zahran Aloush, head of the powerful Jaysh al-Islam Syrian rebel group, was killed on Friday east of Damascus, a monitoring group and Syria’s opposition said.

The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights monitor said Aloush and five other commanders were killed “in an air strike that targeted one of their meetings in Eastern Ghouta.”

Aloush’s death was confirmed on Twitter by the head of Syria’s opposition National Coalition.

It was not immediately clear who had carried out the air strike.

However, Reuters reported that Aloush was killed in the aerial raid that targeted his group’s headquarters, citing two rebel sources as saying on Friday. They said a secret headquarters of the rebel group, which is the largest rebel faction in the area and has thousands of fighters, was targeted by what they described as Russian planes.

Tik bombordavo ne ruskiai, o Sirai

Al Arabiya

[kesylis]

Puiki kaledine dovana nuo Sirijos oro ir spec pajegu speciolios misijos:
[/URL]

Šventės ne pats geriausias metas dalintis vaizdais iš karų, bet kadangi draugui ViR2 nuo jų stipriai gerėja nuotaika, asmeniškai siunčiu dar vieną Kalėdinę Dovaną.https://youtu.be/3hNLtOUpKMc

[andyour]

/\ JAV ir sukūrė tokią situaciją. Kaip ir europiečiai atėję į Afriką, išardė socialines struktūras(kad ir kokios moralės jos buvo) ir sukūrė anarchiją. Rusija taip pat pasielgė su Lietuva, suardė mūsų valstybę, dėl to liaudis morališkai degradavo.

[ViR2]

Shaqiq kesyli, jau buvau sunerimes, kurgi jus pradinges! Alhamdulillah, tu sugryzai! Tikiuosi Medinos saule siuo metu jau pakenciama? O jei rimtai, tai tokio rango teroristo nukovimas jau senai buvo laukiamas ir kad per kaledas nukove - sutapimas Matau, kad visdar patinka gore tematika, bet tik tokia, kuria varo uz mujahedeenu puse, nieko, prasom atgal. Teroristai, is pacio ummah sprogdina vaikus (Beiruto, Latakijos ir Burj Islam jau turbut spejau pasidziaugt, tai dedu siek tiek maziau zinomus):

Zahran Aloush isgamos charakteristika:

Zahran `Alloush: His Ideology and Beliefs
By Joshua Landis
December 15, 2013

Zahran Alloush is the military chief of the Islamic Front (الجبهة الإسلامية, al-Jabhat al-Islāmiyyah), the newly founded super militia that reportedly represents 45,000 fighters. As such, he could turn out to be the most powerful man in rebel held Syria.

Hassan Hassan argues in his article, “Why Syria’s Islamic Front is bad news for radical groups,” that the Jihadist and radical Islamist rhetoric of the Front can be discounted as a positioning ploy, but that the new group is really bad news for al-Qaida groups in Syria because it will stem the slide toward radicalism in Syria and be able to face down militias on their right.

It is too early to know if the Islamic Front will take on the formidable al-Qaida groups in Syria. Despite frequent tensions, the main groups that came together to form the Islamic Front have worked hand in glove with al-Qaida linked forces, particularly al-Nusra, on most battle fronts and recent offensives against the regime.
Zahran Alloush’s rhetoric and propaganda videos provide much insight into his world view, attitude toward Syria’s religious minorities, and vision for Syria’s future. The difference between his ideology and that of al-Qaida groups is not profound. Rather, it is one of shades of grey.
Perhaps the most important video Alloush has produced is this one:
كلمة الشيخ المجاهد زهران علوش للامة وتحدية للرافضة Speech of the Mujahid Zahran Alloush to the Umma on the challange of the “Raafida,” (rejectionists or Shiites).


Alloush uses the great Umayyad desert palace of Caliph Hisham ibn Abd al-Malik as the backdrop for this dramatic video.

This is an anti-Shiite tirade and “bring-back-the-Umayyad-Empire” propaganda piece. It shows how sectarian Alloush is. He refers to Shiites, and reduces the Nusayris into this grouping, as “Majous”, or crypto-Iranians. “Majous” is the old term for pre-Islamic Persians or Zoroastrians. Arab Christians use the term in Christmas carols about the Magi, or “three kings from the Orient” (or east) who come to pay homage to Jesus—Magi are Persians or Easterners. Here it is an Islamic term of abuse meant to suggest that Alawites and Iranians not only have the wrong religion but also the wrong ethnicity—they are not Arabs, but crypto-Iranians. The term Majous is used in many rebel videos to refer to the Assad regime—”al-nizam al-majousi”—or simply to refer to Shiites (or Alawites) generally. It demonstrates how demonized the Alawites are in the propaganda of the new Islamic Front.

Zahran calls for cleansing Damascus of all Shiites and Nusayris. (“Nusayris” is the old term that referred to the Alawites prior to the adoption of “Alawite.” It is considered a term of abuse by Alawites. “Nusayri” refers to the founder of the religion, Ibn Nusayr, and is used by rebels to underscore the assertion that the Alawite religion is man-made and not sent from heaven. For the same reason, Muslims object to the old Christian appellation, Muhammadans, because it suggests that Islam was founded by Muhammad and not God. Christians, of course, believe there is no problem being named after their founder, Christ – but, of course, Christ is considered to be God. Not so Muhammad or Ibn Nusayr by their followers.) Alloush calls for ridding Damascus and Greater Syria of the evil works and impure deeds of the Nusayris, using Qur’anic language throughout to underline their deviant ways. Such language makes Assad’s effort to demonize the revolutionaries and rebels easy. On hearing this sort of talk from the leaders of the revolution, Alawites and other non-Sunni sects worry that their struggle is a fight for their very existence. Unfortunately, the regime treats the opposition with the same sort of extreme language, calling them terrorists, takfiris, and al-Qaida who are not true Syrians. Bigotry and religious intolerance has become a hallmark of the Syrian struggle as both sides try to annul the humanity of the other and completely dismiss each other’s concerns as conspiracies derived from evil. Iranian Ayatollahs have recently issued fatwas of their own, legitimizing religious war in Syria. See: Prominent Shiite Cleric Backs Fighting in Syria about Iran-based Grand Ayatollah Kazim al-Haeri, one of the mentors of radical Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr.

Islamic Front versus al-Qaida Ideology

This video and the language of Alloush demonstrates how difficult it is to draw a clear line between the ideology of the Islamic Front and that of the al-Qaida groups. They both embrace foreign jihadists and encourage them to come Syria to join the fight. They both call for the resurrection of an Islamic Empire and they both look back to the Golden Age of Islam for the principles upon which the new state will be founded. Their political philosophy and blue print for the future is largely based on a similar reading of Islamic history and the Qur’an.

Some analysts try to draw a clear line between al-Qaida and the Islamic Front, insisting that the former support changing Syria’s borders and seek to establish a Caliphate while the latter are Syrian Nationalists. Unfortunately, this distinction is not evident in their rhetoric. Both idealize Islamic Empire, both reject democracy and embrace what they call shari’a, both welcome jihadists from the “Islamic Umma,” both fly the black flag of Islam rather than the Syrian flag as their predominant emblem. The Islamic Front is dominated by Syrians who do have clear parochial interests, whereas ISIS is run by an Iraqi. Foreigners play a dominate role in its command, but this is not so with the Islamic Front. All the same, their ideologies overlap in significant ways.

Geneva II seems very far away when considering the statements of Zahran Alloush. The effort by moderate FSA leaders to recruit Zahran Alloush to their side and to set him against al-Qaida will be difficult. Equally, the US effort to take a new look at him seems driven by equal parts wishful thinking and desperation now that Salim Idriss has been thoroughly disgraced and driven from Syria. Alloush is unlikely to go to Geneva or to embrace any sort of compromise with either Assad or the remains of the Assad regime if Assad were to step aside, as the US demands.

Here are a bunch of tweets and articles underlying how controversial Zahran Alloush is. His Islamic Army is responsible for Douma, the town in which Razan Zeitouneh was kidnapped this week. She is a human rights lawyer and represented what was left of the original Syrian uprising.

Alloush’s Detractors

Zahran has a number of domestic enemies. In the Damascus region, many fighters who are not under his command seem to think that he is a self-promoter. He is also a prime target of the ISIS. He seems to receive the brunt of their social media attacks together with Adnan Arour. The Syrian opposition is uncomfortable to see a leader break away from the pack. This is why Zahran seems to elicit such strong attacks from his competitors and those who do not fall under his command.

Is Alloush the most powerful leader in rebel-held Syria?

He holds the title of military commander of the most powerful militia in Syria, but that is only if we assume that the IF is actually one militia, as it claims. In reality, it is made up of a number of powerful militias. Hassan Aboud, the head of Ahrar al-Sham, may actually be more powerful than Alloush, although he is listed only as the “Chief of the Political Office.” This reminds me of the secret military committee that drove forward the Baathist coups of the 1960s. It was formed by minority officers who found themselves exiled in Egypt by Nasser during the UAR. The leaders were Lieutenant-Colonel Muhammad Umran, Major Salah Jadid and Captain Hafez al-Assad. Like the present Islamic Front, they were supposed to be acting as one. But as they came to power and ceased working behind the scenes, they turned against each other. Assad ended up on the top after using his superior political skills and military base to outmaneuver the others and arrest them. Alloush may look like the strongest member of the IF on paper, but others may have superior force on the ground. Only time will tell.

Alloush and Jabhat al-Nusra

Alloush has gone out of his way to keep good relations with Jabhat al-Nusra. In this video he goes to some lengths to explain that his relationship with Nusra is one of brotherhood with only superficial ideological differences that can be settled with shari’a and discussions. This supports my argument that the ideological differences between the Front and al-Qaida are not deep. He says that Washington’s proscription of Nusra as a terrorist group does not concern him.

قنبلة قائد جيش الإسلام مع جبهة النصرة وعلاقة قائد جيش الإسلام بقائد جبهة النصرة أبي محمد الجولاني

The Islamic Front and the Free Syrian Army

The Islamic Front also overran the Bab al-Hawa crossing into Turkey this week and routed the moderate Free Syrian Army divisions that were loyal to the Supreme Military Command and indirectly represented US efforts to arm Syrian opponents of Assad. Salim Idriss, the putative head of the FSA and direct link to US support for the FSA, fled into Turkey. Here is an excellent video made by an FSA officer who was at one of the arms warehouses when the Islamic Front overran it and stole its contents. He was stripped of his clothes and underclothing while being held upon the ground at gunpoint. Here is Salim Idriss’ account of the events. He denies that the Islamic Front attacked his headquarters and insists that it was protecting his position. US officials have asked the Islamic Front to return US equipment and vehicles taken from the warehouses. In the meantime, Ambassador Ford has met with Alloush to discuss the possibility of his going to Geneva.

Addendum:

Aron Lund, who write and edits the superb Syria in Crisis Blog for the Carnegie website, gave this reply to my questions about the Warehouse incident:

The warehouse attack – it is getting more complicated. I’ve now heard four or five stories about which group it was that first attacked the warehouses (ISIS, JN, SRF, IF, maybe with SMC defectors involved), prompting SMC to call in IF, which overran the whole place (and then decided to stay there, and now they may or may not give the stuff back). It’s tied in with other problems as well, the whole area seems to be bubbling with conflict. Ahrar al-Sham has been fighting Jamal Maarouf’s SRF all across Jabal al-Zawiya, and both seem to have been kidnapping each others members. They now struck a deal for SRF hand back the stolen goods via Jabhat al-Nosra, but I’m not clear if these are the same things that were taken from the stockpiles in Babisqa/Bab el-Hawa; I think not.

Correction (December 16, 2013)

According to Aljazeera, the Ford-Alloush meeting was the idea of a well connected person who attended a meeting between Ford and Idriss. He then suggested that he could bring the IF to the table. Evidently, the guy failed and the meeting never happened. The IF denied it as well. The meeting was based on gossip, rumor and news articles quoting Ford say that the US had not precluded working with Islamists. Also the Washington Post quoted senior US officials to say: “We don’t have a problem with the Islamic Front.”
Here is a translation of one section of the video, for which I thank my research assistant who wishes to remain anonymous.

1:59 minutes …I heard lately what was mentioned by some unclean (أنجاس) Shia, the enemies of Abu Bakr and Omar, the enemies of Osman Bin Affan, even the enemies of Ali ibn Abu Talib. I heard them making threats and promises, about the matter of the Banu Umayya state, saying that they won’t allow the creation of a state like the Banu Umayya state in Sham. And we tell you O unclean (أنجاس), you, who have distorted the Qur’an and challenged the honor (طعنتم بعرض) of the prophet and declared his sahaba kufar (declared his companions to be unbelievers) and killed the Awlia al-Salihiin, and allied with the Tatar and the Mongols and brought every heretic into the country and distorted the religion of Allah…??… and changed the sunna (غيرتم السنه) and fought it and killed the young and old, O you enemies of Islam, O you enemies of the Milah, we will step on your heads in the Najad, if Allah wills it…

[The writing on the screen says: “The sectarian Majousi Yasseh Al Khayth”]

From the mouths of the unclean Shia saying that they won’t allow the creation of the new Umayya state in Sham.

Shia sheikh: do you [Sunnis] want to bring back the Umayya in Sham again? We won’t allow it.

Alloush: The glory of Banu Umayya will return to Sham despite you (despite your noses) and it’s not up to you to allow it or not. The mujahediin of Sham will wash the filth (رجس) of the Rafida and the Rafidia from Sham, they will wash it forever, if Allah wills it, until they cleanse Bilad al-Sham from the filth of the Majous who have fought the religion of Allah.

Shia sheikh: You will find a great Shia intifada that won’t leave anything. You’re not stronger than us, we’re stronger than you, beware of the patient one if he is angered, we’re stronger.

Alloush: They threaten about a Shia intifada and we say that Shia are still servile and small (أذلاء صاغرين ) throughout history and that even Islam destroyed the Shia state repeatedly and destroyed their skulls repeatedly, despite their noses, thanks to Allah. Here are the Shia, wearing servility and shame, bringing in the Tatar to Bilad al-Sham (Greater Syria), bringing in the Mongols to Bilad al-Sham, wearing servility and smallness, and then the Muslims come back and cleanse Bilad al-Sham from their filth and their uncleanliness.

I invite all the mujahidin to join their mujahidin brothers in Sham (Damascus and Greater Syria)

And look at this hadith in which the prophet bids the mujahediin that join their brethren in Sham: The Prophet (peace be upon him) said: It will turn out that you will be armed troops, one in Sham, one in the Yemen and one in Iraq. Ibn Hawalah said: Choose for me, Apostle of Allah, if I reach that time. He replied: Go to Sham, for it is Allah’s chosen land, Go to Sham, for it is Allah’s chosen land, to which his best servants will be gathered, for Allah has on my account taken special charge of Sham and its people… and Zaid bin Thabit Al-Ansari narrated: I heard the Messenger of Allah (peace be upon him) say: ‘Tuba is for Ash-Sham, Tuba is for Ash-Sham, Tuba is for Ash-Sham.” So we said: “Why is that O Messenger of Allah?” He said: Because the angels of Ar-Rahman spread their wings over Sham. Because the angels of Ar-Rahman spread their wings over Sham.”

Thus, congratulations to the people of Sham, for their battle with falsehood (الباطل), congratulations to the people of Sham for being the home of Islam (عقر دار), congratulations to the people of Sham that belief is returning to them from all over the world [he uses the word ya’ariz, from a hadith, talking about the belief ya’zir (returning/retreating/receding) to medina]. You people of Sham are carrying the banner of Islam today, so be worthy of holding it, and raise it high (ارفعوها بحقها) like the prophet asked. Majous, from Rafida and Nusayris, besieged al-Ghouta, they claimed, to prevent the creation of a state, such as that of the Banu Umayya.

And I bid you, o unclean (أنجاس) Rafida, that as the Banu Umayya destroyed your skulls in the past, the people of the Ghouta and the people of Sham will destroy your skulls in the future. And they will make you taste the worst torture in life (الدنيا), before Allah makes you taste the worst torture on judgment day. O unclean Rafida, you will find what you never expected, from the force of the Mujahediin of Islam in Bilad al-Sham until they make you taste the worst torture. O unclean Rafida, you’ll find what will worsen your faces [image, يسوء وجوهكم] in life (الدنيا), what will harm you in life and shame you on judgement day. They (the Shiites) don’t want a state like that of Banu Umayya, because the Banu Umayya state got rid of their obsolete Majousi glory, because the Banu Umayya state destroyed their heads, because the Banu Umayya state established truth (haq) and justice and tawhid.

We are proud of the Banu Umayya state, the capital of which was Damascus. So go (هبوا) O mujahediin to support your brethren, go to support your brethren, we, in Liwaa al-Islam, welcome the mujahediin from all over the world to be an aid and support for us, to fight in our ranks, the rank of Sunna, the Sunna of the messenger of Allah, which raise the banner of tawhid high, until the humiliation and destruction is upon the Majous, the enemies of Allah. Until we cleanse the Sham (Damascus and Greater Syria) from their filth and uncleanliness (?ادناسهم) so go (هبوا) to support you brethren O believers, go to support you brethren O believers, and heaven will await you, and Allah is with you…..7:41

Saltinis: Joshua Landis

Visiem labai rekomenduoju pasiskaityt jo puslapi. Vienas is nedauglio gerai edukuotu NEPRIKLAUSOMU analitiku, kurio pranesimais galima remtis norint issirfruot propaganda, mela ir bullshita is abieju pusiu

[kesylis]

August 10, 2012 "Assad uses the Lebanon option: turn Syria into a swamp and create chaos out of Syria’s sects and factions. It is a strategy of playing upon divisions to sow chaos."
http://www.joshualandis.com/blog/cre...assads-plan-b/

[Dadis]

As-sayyid kesylis grįžo! Kaip ten demokratiškoji Sirijos opozicija gyvuoja? Beje, tik neseniai perskaičiau viename straipsnyje:

Sermonizing was very much in evidence in Obama's May 19, 2011 speech enunciating his vision of the "Arab Spring" where the president had no qualms about telling local leaders how to conduct themselves in the face of the regional turbulence. "The Syrian people have shown their courage in demanding a transition to democracy," he categorically stated as if the predominantly Islamist rebels had the slightest interest in the idea and as if the Damascus dictator was taking his marching orders from Washington.

Iš kitos operos - dar visai neseniai tai būtų skambėję kaip koks nevykęs pokštas, o dabar va - bičą iš "Daesh" nagų išgelbėjo... Talibanas:

Kidnapped by IS, saved by the Taliban
http://www.bbc.com, 2015.12.26

[ViR2]

Naujos nuotraukos su Soleimani, vakar diena, Bashkuy (Siaures Aleppo, kur al Nusra nesekmingai bande isiverzti):



Sviezios vakar dienos nuotraukos su IRGC (Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps) is pietu Aleppo fronto:







Dar siek tiek apie Aloush vaidmeni:


Naujausias video is Deir ez Zoir fronto, kovoj pries Daesh pukuotukus:

Na ir galiausiai: RAMADI isvaduotas nuo DAESH!. Pries 10min, isplatino Irako MoD pranesima, netrukus idesiu ir video is centro.

SDF isvadavo Tishrin miesta ir uztvanka nuo pukuotuku. Spekuliuojama, jog prasides lenktynes del rytu Aleppo. SDF stumsis i Manbij, o Sirijos kariuomene nuo vakar pakeite krypti ir skuba imti al Bab (kas manau jiems nepavyks, nes labai jau istempe savo pajegas, bet dar pamatysim turbut).


Nukirtus Tisheen aprupinimo kanala, pukuotukams liko tik Deir Hafir, nuo kurio Sirijos kariuomene tera per 2km. Ji nukirtus - pagaliau pamatysim realu pukuotuku birejima

Erdoganas pazadejo, jog jei SDF perzengs Eufrata - tai bus turku raudona linija. Bus idomu paziuret ar puls Erdoganas gint Daesh ar visgi jo raudonos linijos, kaip ir Obamos Manbij SDF yra pasiekiamas, taciau labai abejoju ar Turkai toleruos SDF perimta Jarabulus pasienio punkto kontrole is Daesh. Va cia jau tures skystaklynis Obama isijungt ir uzspaust Erdogana, kad jis nesugalvotu uzpult SDF.

Kesylis, turbut sunku matyt pukuotukus visais frontais "traukiamus"?

Beje, penas mintims, sviezia Daesh pukuotuko nuotrauka. Atkreipt demesi, jog ant pakuociu yra Kataro paramos logotipai