And why was John banned?
It seems we can't get a clear, consistent reason from SCity. One day it's one story, the next day it's another as threads get deleted and the tale spins on.
John and I were both banned on the same day, January 11, seemingly at the same hour, and quite conceivably by the same hand.
Now that a month has gone by let us examine things calmly and rationally and seek to put them into context.
MYTH No.1: she refused to apologize
On January 10, after he had become aware of the contents of the SSC actualijos thread here at Miestai, I received the following PM from Detritus:
This didn't sound like the pained outcry of a wounded soul to me at all and hardly an invitation to apologize. I answered
I was banned within hours of sending that PM, and so was John.
A couple of points in explanation: A bon entendeur means "a word to the wise." Hence my inquiry about a possible warning. Also, Detritus had "Mi perforar el culo" or sth as his user title at the time I wrote the note.
So much for the "refusal" story.
MYTH No.2: she received numerous warnings
There were constant allusions to warnings that were supposedly sent to me in great numbers by several mods/admins that I purportedly chose to ignore in threads that have been deleted.
As I said in post #27 of the SSC and SSP issues thread, I received no warnings. Once SHiRO got a bit mad at me "you're not being helpful at all" in the SSC thread where he had proposed closure of the S&B Skybar -- it may have been in the companion thread where he suggested the institution of a photo forum -- and I promptly shut up. And then there was the "A bon entendeur" from Detritus.
That's absolutely all. There simply were no warnings.
After reading reference after reference to all those warnings I had supposedly received and ignored, I asked through an SCity admin whether those warnings could be reproduced. I didn't receive an answer ... not the guy's fault, though. After all, they are phantom warnings -- they don't exist.
So much for the "warnings" story.
OK, this is enough for one session. I'm going to take a break.
To be continued ...
It seems we can't get a clear, consistent reason from SCity. One day it's one story, the next day it's another as threads get deleted and the tale spins on.
John and I were both banned on the same day, January 11, seemingly at the same hour, and quite conceivably by the same hand.
Now that a month has gone by let us examine things calmly and rationally and seek to put them into context.
MYTH No.1: she refused to apologize
On January 10, after he had become aware of the contents of the SSC actualijos thread here at Miestai, I received the following PM from Detritus:
Parašė Detritus
Parašė Whose Homepage
A couple of points in explanation: A bon entendeur means "a word to the wise." Hence my inquiry about a possible warning. Also, Detritus had "Mi perforar el culo" or sth as his user title at the time I wrote the note.
So much for the "refusal" story.
MYTH No.2: she received numerous warnings
There were constant allusions to warnings that were supposedly sent to me in great numbers by several mods/admins that I purportedly chose to ignore in threads that have been deleted.
As I said in post #27 of the SSC and SSP issues thread, I received no warnings. Once SHiRO got a bit mad at me "you're not being helpful at all" in the SSC thread where he had proposed closure of the S&B Skybar -- it may have been in the companion thread where he suggested the institution of a photo forum -- and I promptly shut up. And then there was the "A bon entendeur" from Detritus.
That's absolutely all. There simply were no warnings.
After reading reference after reference to all those warnings I had supposedly received and ignored, I asked through an SCity admin whether those warnings could be reproduced. I didn't receive an answer ... not the guy's fault, though. After all, they are phantom warnings -- they don't exist.
So much for the "warnings" story.
OK, this is enough for one session. I'm going to take a break.
To be continued ...
Comment