Nice. In Lithuania you'll never see train like this (2xDR1A).
Skelbimas
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Geležinkelių stebėjimai (Video filmavimai)
Collapse
X
-
Parašė BastA-7 Rodyti pranešimąbaik baik, teko matyt, čia nebutinai reiškia, kad dėl keleiviu gausos jie abu sukabinti tiesiog kad vienas rezervu nevažiuotu
Comment
-
Parašė statyba Rodyti pranešimąDeja, tačiau Latvijoje tamstos nusivylimui būtent dėl keleivių gausos ir patogumo sukabinami traukiniai Pakanka elementaraus mąstymo ir rezultatai akivaizdūs keleivių vežime
Ypatingai "elementarus mąstymas" pademonstruotas keleivinį traukinį Ryga - Minskas paleidus aplenkiant Lietuvą, greičiau ne mąstymas, o de......
Comment
-
Idomus video,lietuvoje ruozas Siauliai-Klaipeda
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZbVn...eature=related
Comment
-
Parašė bosco Rodyti pranešimąNice. In Lithuania you'll never see train like this (2xDR1A).
Guys, come on, you know that lots of people from Latvia have relatives in Northeastern part of Belarus: Verhnedvinsk, Polotsk, Novopolotsk, Vitebsk. I was one of them. And many of these people happen to live in Latgale, that is Rēzekne, Daugavpils, Jēkabpils. So passing Riga-Minsk train through Lithuania doesn't make any sense. It's basically pointless. Only Riga and Minsk would be left among major towns with significant Russian-speaking population.
If we are talking about Latvia-Lietuva connection, what we need is a dedicated train from Riga to Vilnius, but that's another story. I would've preferred DR1A diesel, because it would be cheaper. But returning to Minsk-Riga topic, you guys have no problem getting to Belarus. How many trains have you got there, all going through Vilnius and to Minsk? You certainly don't need another transit train, especially with this shortage of passenger locomotives. As you probably know, LG stopped using TEP60-0923 and TEP60-0926. Only 4 TEP70's and 4 TEP70BS's are left. But M62K's seem to be unsuitable both for operating transit trains (too heavy) and the fast K-V-K train.
I didn't get all of your discussion since "Google Translate" does a lousy job at translating it. Separate words (jargon ones?) don't get translated at all and therefore whole sentences lose their sense. I got to learn Lithuanian myself some day
Yes, some diesel routes in Latvia could have been retained, such as ones to Ventspils, Reņģe, Ērgļi, Daugavpils-Rēzekne, but that didn't happen. Perhaps people in "Pasažieru vilciens" just don't have enough wits for that to happen. Or maybe there's another reason for that, such as competition with buses, which many prefer over trains. Or even something else. I just don't know.
But can somebody tell me, why there are whole 5 (!) pairs of diesels each day going to Turmantas, small village at the border with Latvia, and not a single one crossing the border and entering the 100-thousand Daugavpils? Only extra 25 km! What's the problem? I doubt that such train would not be popular. Especially if it was coordinated with one of Riga-Daugavpils trains, like it was done with Riga-Valga and Valga-Tallinn trains. Or vice versa, Riga-Daugavpils could be adjusted appropriately. Or both. If people could buy a direct ticket from Riga to Vilnius and travel in such way, lots would use this opportunity. By the way, the route through Daugavpils is just a little bit longer than the one through Jelgava and Šiauliai.Paskutinis taisė sciff; 2011.06.04, 05:35.
Comment
-
Parašė JohnThanks for your input, sciff. Do you have any photos (especially interiors) of Latvian trains? We have a dedicated thread for Latvian Railays here: http://www.miestai.net/forumas/showthread.php?t=6873
I have a lot of very detailed photos of our DR1As, both inside and outside, but I'm not sure if anyone is interested. Unfortunately, no photos of express DR1As interior, because it's impossible to get in without a ticket.
Comment
-
Parašė Furbo Rodyti pranešimąIvanivanov'ui atsirado konkurentas Sciff
Good Job sciff.
Comment
Comment